Re: general protection fault in io_poll_double_wake (2)
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: syzbot <syzbot+81b3883093f772addf6d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, syzkaller-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
: Re: general protection fault in io_poll_double_wake (2)
From
: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:42:01 -0600
In-reply-to
: <
000000000000478f3a05b05a7539@google.com
>
User-agent
: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
#syz test: git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block io_uring-5.9 -- Jens Axboe
Follow-Ups
:
Re: general protection fault in io_poll_double_wake (2)
From:
syzbot
References
:
general protection fault in io_poll_double_wake (2)
From:
syzbot
Prev by Date:
RE: Mount options may be silently discarded
Next by Date:
PROBLEM: potential concurrency bug between do_vfs_ioctl() and do_readv()
Previous by thread:
general protection fault in io_poll_double_wake (2)
Next by thread:
Re: general protection fault in io_poll_double_wake (2)
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Ext4 Filesystem]
[Union Filesystem]
[Filesystem Testing]
[Ceph Users]
[Ecryptfs]
[AutoFS]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux Cachefs]
[Reiser Filesystem]
[Linux RAID]
[Samba]
[Device Mapper]
[CEPH Development]