> > >> --- a/fs/exfat/namei.c > > >> +++ b/fs/exfat/namei.c > > >> @@ -1095,11 +1095,6 @@ static int exfat_move_file(struct inode > > >> *inode, struct exfat_chain *p_olddir, > > >> if (!epmov) > > >> return -EIO; > > >> > > >> - /* check if the source and target directory is the same */ > > >> - if (exfat_get_entry_type(epmov) == TYPE_DIR && > > >> - le32_to_cpu(epmov->dentry.stream.start_clu) == p_newdir->dir) > > >> - return -EINVAL; > > >> - > > > > > > It might check if the cluster numbers are same between source entry > > > and target directory. > > > > This checks if newdir is the move target itself. > > Example: > > mv /mnt/dir0 /mnt/dir0/foo > > > > However, this check is not enough. > > We need to check newdir and all ancestors. > > Example: > > mv /mnt/dir0 /mnt/dir0/dir1/foo > > mv /mnt/dir0 /mnt/dir0/dir1/dir2/foo > > ... > > > > This is probably a taboo for all layered filesystems. > > > > > > > Could you let me know what code you mentioned? > > > Or do you mean the codes on vfs? > > > > You can find in do_renameat2(). --- around 'fs/namei.c:4440' > > If the destination ancestors are itself, our driver will not be called. > > I think, of course, vfs has been doing that. > So that code is unnecessary in normal situations. > > That code comes from the old exfat implementation. > And as far as I understand, it seems to check once more "the cluster number" > even though it comes through vfs so that it tries detecting abnormal of on-disk. > > Anyway, I agonized if it is really needed. > In conclusion, old code could be eliminated and your patch looks reasonable. > Thanks > > Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > BTW > > Are you busy now? > I'm sorry, I'm so busy for my full time work :( Anyway, I'm trying to review serious bug patches or > bug reports first. > Other patches, such as clean-up or code refactoring, may take some time to review. > > > I am waiting for your reply about "integrates dir-entry getting and > > validation" patch. > As I know, your patch is being under review by Namjae. I already gave comments and a patch, but you said you can't do it. I'm sorry, But I can't accept an incomplete patch. I will directly fix it later. > > > > > BR > > --- > > Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@xxxxxxxxx>