On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 10:31:49PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > ... and I replied with a detailed analysis of what it is fine, and > > how this just restores the behavior we historically had before > > switching to the iomap direct I/O code. Although if we want to go > > into the fine details we did not have the REQ_FUA path back then, > > but that does not change the analysis. > > You did? Got a link? Not sure if vger/oraclemail are still delaying > messages for me.... :/ Two replies from September 17 to the "Re: [RFC PATCH] btrfs: don't call btrfs_sync_file from iomap context" thread. Msg IDs: 20200917055232.GA31646@xxxxxx and 20200917064238.GA32441@xxxxxx
