[RFC PATCH 0/2] should core.fsyncObjectFiles fsync the dir entry + docs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I was re-reading the
https://lore.kernel.org/git/20180117184828.31816-1-hch@xxxxxx/ thread
today and thought we should at least update the docs, and per my
earlier E-Mail in
https://lore.kernel.org/git/87sgbghdbp.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
perhaps the directory entry should also be synced.

I kept linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in the CC, it was in the original
thread, but more importantly it would be really nice to have people
who know more about the state of filesystems on Linux and other OS's
to give 2/2 a read to see how accurate what I put together is.

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason (2):
  sha1-file: fsync() loose dir entry when core.fsyncObjectFiles
  core.fsyncObjectFiles: make the docs less flippant

 Documentation/config/core.txt | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 sha1-file.c                   | 19 +++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

-- 
2.28.0.297.g1956fa8f8d




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux