On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 19:13 -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 03:16:51PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > This is the third posting of the ceph+fscrypt integration work. This > > just covers context handling, filename and symlink support. > > > > The main changes since the last set are mainly to address Eric's review > > comments. Hopefully this will be much closer to mergeable. Some highlights: > > > > 1/ rebase onto Eric's fscrypt-file-creation-v2 tag > > > > 2/ fscrypt_context_for_new_inode now takes a void * to hold the context > > > > 3/ make fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr designate whether the returned name > > is a nokey name. This is necessary to close a potential race in > > readdir support > > > > 4/ fscrypt_base64_encode/decode remain in fs/crypto (not moved into lib/) > > > > 5/ test_dummy_encryption handling is moved into a separate patch, and > > several bugs fixed that resulted in context not being set up > > properly. > > > > 6/ symlink handling now works > > > > Content encryption is the next step, but I want to get the fscache > > rework done first. It would be nice if we were able to store encrypted > > files in the cache, for instance. > > > > This set has been tagged as "ceph-fscrypt-rfc.3" in my tree here: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jlayton/linux.git > > > > Note that this is still quite preliminary, but my goal is to get a set > > merged for v5.11. > > A few comments that didn't fit anywhere else: > > I'm looking forward to contents encryption, as that's the most important part. > Me too, but I've got a fairly substantial rework of the buffered writeback code queued up to handle some fscache changes. We'll probably need to teach fscache how to deal with encrypted data, so I haven't really started on that part yet. > Is there any possibility that the fscrypt xfstests can be run on ceph? > See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/filesystems/fscrypt.html#tests > I've been testing with the xfstests "quick" group as a sanity test, but it doesn't have the fscrypt tests. I'll try them out soon. > In fs/ceph/Kconfig, CEPH_FS needs: > > select FS_ENCRYPTION_ALGS if FS_ENCRYPTION > > There are compile errors when !CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION. > Thanks. I should have added the caveat that this is still _very_ rough and not at all ready for merge. I'll definitely fix up the !CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION case before I send the next set. Thanks for the detailed review so far. I'm working through your comments now and should address most of them in the next set. -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>