On 2020/09/11 17:57, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Subsequent patches need to call zonefs_io_error() with the i_truncate_mutex
> already held, so factor out the body of zonefs_io_error() into
> __zonefs_io_error() which can be called from with the i_truncate_mutex
> held.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/zonefs/super.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/zonefs/super.c b/fs/zonefs/super.c
> index 6e13a5127b01..4309979eeb36 100644
> --- a/fs/zonefs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/zonefs/super.c
> @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static int zonefs_io_error_cb(struct blk_zone *zone, unsigned int idx,
> * eventually correct the file size and zonefs inode write pointer offset
> * (which can be out of sync with the drive due to partial write failures).
> */
> -static void zonefs_io_error(struct inode *inode, bool write)
> +static void __zonefs_io_error(struct inode *inode, bool write)
> {
> struct zonefs_inode_info *zi = ZONEFS_I(inode);
> struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
> @@ -362,8 +362,6 @@ static void zonefs_io_error(struct inode *inode, bool write)
> };
> int ret;
>
> - mutex_lock(&zi->i_truncate_mutex);
> -
> /*
> * Memory allocations in blkdev_report_zones() can trigger a memory
> * reclaim which may in turn cause a recursion into zonefs as well as
> @@ -379,7 +377,14 @@ static void zonefs_io_error(struct inode *inode, bool write)
> zonefs_err(sb, "Get inode %lu zone information failed %d\n",
> inode->i_ino, ret);
> memalloc_noio_restore(noio_flag);
> +}
>
> +static void zonefs_io_error(struct inode *inode, bool write)
> +{
> + struct zonefs_inode_info *zi = ZONEFS_I(inode);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&zi->i_truncate_mutex);
> + __zonefs_io_error(inode, write);
> mutex_unlock(&zi->i_truncate_mutex);
> }
>
>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
