Re: [RESEND] [PATCH] VFS: make file->f_pos access atomic on 32bit arch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 10:32 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> About dup() syscall, it wont help, since old and new descriptor points to
> the same "struct file", definitly sharing file position, since first Unixes.
> 
> To quote the fine manual :
> 
>        After successful return of dup or dup2, the old and new descriptors may
>        be used interchangeably. They share locks, file position  pointers  and
>        flags;  for example, if the file position is modified by using lseek on
>        one of the descriptors, the position is also changed for the other.

Ah, ok. I'll try to remember for next time I write a multi-threaded user
app (which given the size of my kernel todo list won't be any time soon
I guess ;-)

> pread()/pwrite() are used my multi-threaded applications that want to share
> a single "struct file".

Yeah, pread/pwrite is good.

>  Or they must use some form of synchronization around
> regular read()/write()/lseek() calls.
> 
> There is no generic f_pos race, only buggy applications.

Agreed.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux