Re: [PATCH v2] quota: widen timestamps for the fs_disk_quota structure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 12:02:18PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sat 05-09-20 09:47:03, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Soon, XFS will support quota grace period expiration timestamps beyond
> > the year 2038, widen the timestamp fields to handle the extra time bits.
> > Internally, XFS now stores unsigned 34-bit quantities, so the extra 8
> > bits here should work fine.  (Note that XFS is the only user of this
> > structure.)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Looks good to me. Just one question below:
> 
> > diff --git a/fs/quota/quota.c b/fs/quota/quota.c
> > index 5444d3c4d93f..eefac57c52fd 100644
> > --- a/fs/quota/quota.c
> > +++ b/fs/quota/quota.c
> > @@ -481,6 +481,14 @@ static inline u64 quota_btobb(u64 bytes)
> >  	return (bytes + (1 << XFS_BB_SHIFT) - 1) >> XFS_BB_SHIFT;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline s64 copy_from_xfs_dqblk_ts(const struct fs_disk_quota *d,
> > +		__s32 timer, __s8 timer_hi)
> > +{
> > +	if (d->d_fieldmask & FS_DQ_BIGTIME)
> > +		return (u32)timer | (s64)timer_hi << 32;
> > +	return timer;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> So this doesn't do any checks that the resulting time fits into 34-bits you
> speak about in the changelog. So how will XFS react if malicious / buggy
> userspace will pass too big timestamp? I suppose xfs_fs_set_dqblk() should
> return EFBIG or EINVAL or something like that which I'm not sure it does...
> 
> For record I've checked VFS quota implementation and it doesn't need any
> checks because VFS in memory structures and on-disk format use 64-bit
> timestamps. The ancient quota format uses 32-bit timestamps for 32-bit
> archs so these would get silently truncated when stored on disk but
> honestly I don't think I care (that format was deprecated some 20 years
> ago).

XFS will clamp any out-of-bounds value to the nearest representable
number.  For example, if you tried to extend a quota's grace expiration
to the year 2600, it set the expiration to 2486, similar to what the vfs
does for timestamps now.  If you try to set the default grace period to,
say, 100 years, it will clamp that to 68 years (2^31-1).

(I doubt anyone cares to set a 60+ year grace period, but as some
apparently immortal person claims to be playing a 600-year musical
score[1] perhaps we will need to revisit that...)

--D

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/As_Slow_as_Possible

> 
> 								Honza
> -- 
> Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
> SUSE Labs, CR



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux