On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 08:38:13AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Wait a sec... how is that supposed to build with X86_5LEVEL? Do you mean > > > > #define LOAD_TASK_SIZE_MINUS_N(n) \ > > ALTERNATIVE __stringify(mov $((1 << 47) - 4096 - (n)),%rdx), \ > > __stringify(mov $((1 << 56) - 4096 - (n)),%rdx), X86_FEATURE_LA57 > > > > there? > > Don't ask me about the how, but it builds and works with X86_5LEVEL, > and the style is copied from elsewhere.. Actually, it doesn't any more. Looks like the change to pass the n parameter as suggested by Linus broke the previously working version.
