On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 02:23:39PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 01:51:20PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 1:37 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > As I said to Dave, you and I have a strong difference of opinion here. > > > I think that what you are proposing is madness. You're making it too > > > flexible which comes with too much opportunity for abuse. > > > > Such as? > > One proposal I saw earlier in this thread was to do something like > $ runalt /path/to/file ls > which would open_alt() /path/to/file, fchdir to it and run ls inside it. > That's just crazy. As I've said before, malware authors would love that features. Most system administrators won't. Oh, one other question about ADS; if a file system supports reflink, what is supposed to happen when you reflink a file? You have to consider all of the ADS's to be reflinked as well? In some ways, this is good, because the overhead and complexity will probably cause most file system maintainers to throw up their had, say this is madness, and refuse to implement it. :-) - Ted
