Re: [PATCH 05/10] lkdtm: disable set_fs-based tests for !CONFIG_SET_FS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 8:00 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Once we can't manipulate the address limit, we also can't test what
> happens when the manipulation is abused.

Just remove these tests entirely.

Once set_fs() doesn't exist on x86, the tests no longer make any sense
what-so-ever, because test coverage will be basically zero.

So don't make the code uglier just to maintain a fiction that
something is tested when it isn't really.

                 Linus



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux