On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 03:55:10PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> Pass the full length to iomap_zero() and dax_iomap_zero(), and have
> them return how many bytes they actually handled. This is preparatory
> work for handling THP, although it looks like DAX could actually take
> advantage of it if there's a larger contiguous area.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/dax.c | 13 ++++++-------
> fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 33 +++++++++++++++------------------
> include/linux/dax.h | 3 +--
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index 95341af1a966..f2b912cb034e 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
> @@ -1037,18 +1037,18 @@ static vm_fault_t dax_load_hole(struct xa_state *xas,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -int dax_iomap_zero(loff_t pos, unsigned offset, unsigned size,
> - struct iomap *iomap)
> +loff_t dax_iomap_zero(loff_t pos, u64 length, struct iomap *iomap)
> {
> sector_t sector = iomap_sector(iomap, pos & PAGE_MASK);
> pgoff_t pgoff;
> long rc, id;
> void *kaddr;
> bool page_aligned = false;
> -
> + unsigned offset = offset_in_page(pos);
> + unsigned size = min_t(u64, PAGE_SIZE - offset, length);
>
> if (IS_ALIGNED(sector << SECTOR_SHIFT, PAGE_SIZE) &&
> - IS_ALIGNED(size, PAGE_SIZE))
> + (size == PAGE_SIZE))
> page_aligned = true;
>
> rc = bdev_dax_pgoff(iomap->bdev, sector, PAGE_SIZE, &pgoff);
> @@ -1058,8 +1058,7 @@ int dax_iomap_zero(loff_t pos, unsigned offset, unsigned size,
> id = dax_read_lock();
>
> if (page_aligned)
> - rc = dax_zero_page_range(iomap->dax_dev, pgoff,
> - size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + rc = dax_zero_page_range(iomap->dax_dev, pgoff, 1);
> else
> rc = dax_direct_access(iomap->dax_dev, pgoff, 1, &kaddr, NULL);
> if (rc < 0) {
> @@ -1072,7 +1071,7 @@ int dax_iomap_zero(loff_t pos, unsigned offset, unsigned size,
> dax_flush(iomap->dax_dev, kaddr + offset, size);
> }
> dax_read_unlock(id);
> - return 0;
> + return size;
> }
>
> static loff_t
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index 7f618ab4b11e..2dba054095e8 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -901,11 +901,13 @@ iomap_file_unshare(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_file_unshare);
>
> -static int iomap_zero(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, unsigned offset,
> - unsigned bytes, struct iomap *iomap, struct iomap *srcmap)
> +static loff_t iomap_zero(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, u64 length,
> + struct iomap *iomap, struct iomap *srcmap)
While you are touching this, please convert it back to:
static loff_t
iomap_zero(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, u64 length,
struct iomap *iomap, struct iomap *srcmap)
> {
> struct page *page;
> int status;
> + unsigned offset = offset_in_page(pos);
> + unsigned bytes = min_t(u64, PAGE_SIZE - offset, length);
>
> status = iomap_write_begin(inode, pos, bytes, 0, &page, iomap, srcmap);
> if (status)
> @@ -917,38 +919,33 @@ static int iomap_zero(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, unsigned offset,
> return iomap_write_end(inode, pos, bytes, bytes, page, iomap, srcmap);
> }
>
> -static loff_t
> -iomap_zero_range_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t count,
> - void *data, struct iomap *iomap, struct iomap *srcmap)
> +static loff_t iomap_zero_range_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos,
> + loff_t length, void *data, struct iomap *iomap,
> + struct iomap *srcmap)
And leave this as it was formatted.
/me missed this when iomap_readahead() was introduced, too.
> {
> bool *did_zero = data;
> loff_t written = 0;
> - int status;
>
> /* already zeroed? we're done. */
> if (srcmap->type == IOMAP_HOLE || srcmap->type == IOMAP_UNWRITTEN)
> - return count;
> + return length;
>
> do {
> - unsigned offset, bytes;
> -
> - offset = offset_in_page(pos);
> - bytes = min_t(loff_t, PAGE_SIZE - offset, count);
> + loff_t bytes;
>
> if (IS_DAX(inode))
> - status = dax_iomap_zero(pos, offset, bytes, iomap);
> + bytes = dax_iomap_zero(pos, length, iomap);
Hmmm. everything is loff_t here, but the callers are defining length
as u64, not loff_t. Is there a potential sign conversion problem
here? (sure 64 bit is way beyond anything we'll pass here, but...)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
