Re: Re: possible deadlock in io_poll_double_wake

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Re: possible deadlock in io_poll_double_wake
From: syzbot <syzbot+0d56cfeec64f045baffc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 11:15:00 -0700
Cc: axboe@xxxxxxxxx, io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, syzkaller-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <e3494c53-f84e-5152-42b0-f8ddd3ad4ccb@kernel.dk>

> #syz dupe general protection fault in io_poll_double_wake

unknown command "dupe"

>
> -- 
> Jens Axboe
>

References:
- Re: possible deadlock in io_poll_double_wake
  - From: Jens Axboe

Prev by Date: [PATCH] exfat: use i_blocksize() to get blocksize
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fs: NTFS read-write driver GPL implementation by Paragon Software.
Previous by thread: Re: Re: possible deadlock in io_poll_double_wake
Next by thread: [PATCH] exfat: use i_blocksize() to get blocksize
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux