2020-07-31 18:56 GMT+09:00, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 9:16 AM Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> Hi folk, >> >> In this release, The performance of fsck have been much improved and >> the new option in mkfs have been added to adjust boundary alignment. >> >> As the result below, The fsck performance is improved close to windows's >> fsck >> and much faster than the one in exfat-utils package. >> >> We measured the performance on Samsung 64GB Pro microSDXC UHS-I Class 10 >> which >> was filled up to 35GB with 9948 directories and 16506 files. >> >> | Implementation | version | execution time (seconds) | >> |--------------------- |-------------------|--------------------------| >> | **exfatprogs fsck** | 1.0.4 | 11.561 | >> | Windows fsck | Windows 10 1809 | 11.449 | >> | [exfat-fuse fsck] | 1.3.0 | 68.977 | >> > > Hi Namjae Jeon (what is your First name and Family name?), Hi Sedat, First name : Namjae, Last name : Jeon > > congrats to version 1.0.4 and hope to see it in the Debian repositories > soon. Thanks:) > > Great numbers for exfatprogs/fsck! > >> And we have been preparing to add fsck repair feature in the next >> version. >> Any feedback is welcome!:) >> >> CHANGES : >> * fsck.exfat: display sector, cluster, and volume sizes in the human >> readable format. >> * fsck.exfat: reduce the elapsed time using read-ahead. >> >> NEW FEATURES : >> * mkfs.exfat: generate pseudo unique serials while creating filesystems. >> * mkfs.exfat: add the "-b" option to align the start offset of FAT and >> data clusters. >> * fsck.exfat: repair zero-byte files which have the NoFatChain >> attribute. >> >> BUG FIXES : >> * Fix memory leaks on error handling paths. >> * fsck.exfat: fix the bug that cannot access space beyond 2TB. >> >> The git tree is at: >> https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs >> >> The tarballs can be found at: >> >> https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs/releases/download/1.0.4/exfatprogs-1.0.4.tar.gz >> > > Just a small nit for the next announcement. > Please point (also) to the tar.xz tarball and maybe to the releases > tag in GitHub. Sure. I will do that on next release. > ( Today, I love/prefer to use ZSTD where possible - that is another story. > ) I'm not sure if it is meaningful to provide various compression for small archive file. In particular, I wonder if other distribution maintainers want it. > > Have more fun. Nice day! > > Regards, > - Sedat - > > [1] > https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs/releases/download/1.0.4/exfatprogs-1.0.4.tar.xz > [2] https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs/releases/tag/1.0.4 >
