Re: [PATCH 5/5] seqcount: More consistent seqprop names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] seqcount: More consistent seqprop names
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 16:39:51 +0200
Cc: mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx, bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, corbet@xxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200729140142.552991630@infradead.org>

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 03:52:54PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Attempt uniformity and brevity.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Acked-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH 0/5] seqlock: Cleanups
  - From: Peter Zijlstra
- [PATCH 5/5] seqcount: More consistent seqprop names
  - From: Peter Zijlstra

Prev by Date: Re: mmotm 2020-07-27-18-18 uploaded (mm/page_alloc.c)
Next by Date: [RFC] orangefs: posix acl fix...
Previous by thread: [PATCH 5/5] seqcount: More consistent seqprop names
Next by thread: [PATCH 3/5] seqlock: Fold seqcount_LOCKNAME_init() definition
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux