On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Kentaro Takeda (takedakn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx): [please trim quoted material..] > > > > +config SECURITY_PATH > > + bool "Security hooks for pathname based access control" > > + depends on SECURITY > > + help > > + This enables the security hooks for pathname based access control. > > + If enabled, a security module can use these hooks to > > + implement pathname based access controls. > > + If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N. > > Is there any reason why users should have to deal with this option? > Would it make sense in this case to make the option and have tomoyo and > apparmor select it? Who are users in this case? It's probably useful as a separate option for testing purposes and for people doing development. LSMs which depend on it should probably still use SELECT in any case. -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
