On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:03:45PM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote: Would you mind terribly if I rename things like so? I tried and failed to come up with a shorter name in general, these functions names are somewhat unwieldy. I considered s/_default//. --- --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ unsigned int uclamp_rq_max_value(struct return uclamp_idle_value(rq, clamp_id, clamp_value); } -static void __uclamp_sync_util_min_rt_default_locked(struct task_struct *p) +static void __uclamp_update_util_min_rt_default(struct task_struct *p) { unsigned int default_util_min; struct uclamp_se *uc_se; @@ -931,7 +931,7 @@ static void __uclamp_sync_util_min_rt_de uclamp_se_set(uc_se, default_util_min, false); } -static void __uclamp_sync_util_min_rt_default(struct task_struct *p) +static void uclamp_update_util_min_rt_default(struct task_struct *p) { struct rq_flags rf; struct rq *rq; @@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ static void __uclamp_sync_util_min_rt_de /* Protect updates to p->uclamp_* */ rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf); - __uclamp_sync_util_min_rt_default_locked(p); + __uclamp_update_util_min_rt_default(p); task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf); } @@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ static void uclamp_sync_util_min_rt_defa rcu_read_lock(); for_each_process_thread(g, p) - __uclamp_sync_util_min_rt_default(p); + uclamp_update_util_min_rt_default(p); rcu_read_unlock(); } @@ -1360,7 +1360,7 @@ static void __setscheduler_uclamp(struct * at runtime. */ if (unlikely(rt_task(p) && clamp_id == UCLAMP_MIN)) - __uclamp_sync_util_min_rt_default_locked(p); + __uclamp_update_util_min_rt_default(p); else uclamp_se_set(uc_se, uclamp_none(clamp_id), false); @@ -1404,7 +1404,7 @@ static void uclamp_fork(struct task_stru static void uclamp_post_fork(struct task_struct *p) { - __uclamp_sync_util_min_rt_default(p); + uclamp_update_util_min_rt_default(p); } static void __init init_uclamp_rq(struct rq *rq)