Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Protecting file->f_pos with a lock adds some overhead but I think we should > fix this. > I used seqlock to serialize the access to file->f_pos. This approach is > similar to inode->i_size synchronization. > > Comments? > + if (offset != file_pos_read(file)) > + file_pos_write(file, offset); Maybe file_pos_write should do this check? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
