Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] tmpfs: Per-superblock i_ino support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Wilcox writes:
I don't think that works.  I think you meant to write ~(SHMEM_INO_BATCH - 1).
Or just ino % SHMEM_INO_BATCH which works even for non-power-of-two.

Er, right. I now wonder why I didn't just write `ino % SHMEM_INO_BATCH` :-)

I'll send again with that fix.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux