Re: [PATCH 01/16] init: remove the bstat helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 3:34 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:25:41PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> > Hi Christoph,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:53 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > The only caller of the bstat function becomes cleaner and simpler when
> > > open coding the function.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> >
> > Thanks for the set. md parts of the set look good to me.
> >
> > How should we route this set, as it touches multiple subsystems?
>
> Good question as there is no really applicable tree.  One option
> would the vfs tree as it toucheѕ some VFS stuff, and the follow on
> series that depends on it is all about VFS bits.  Alternatively I
> could set up a tree just for these bits.  The important bit is that
> it doesn't go into the -mm tree as the usual catchall, as I have
> more stuff that depends on it and requires a git tree.

Would this official mm tree work?

T:      git git://github.com/hnaz/linux-mm.git

If not, I am OK with either vfs tree or a dedicated tree.

Thanks,
Song




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux