On 7/6/20 11:15 PM, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote: > > > On 07/07/20 11:14 am, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 7/6/20 6:53 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: >>> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2020-07-06-18-53 has been uploaded to >>> >>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fwww.ozlabs.org%2F~akpm%2Fmmotm%2F&data=02%7C01%7CVijendar.Mukunda%40amd.com%7C34f06090b5394f9ccb9d08d82238c5cf%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637296974530250787&sdata=K8z5g9P5S7Ct%2BojnITdP0xuz159sYOiDWOyUy3abDpo%3D&reserved=0 >>> >>> mmotm-readme.txt says >>> >>> README for mm-of-the-moment: >>> >>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fwww.ozlabs.org%2F~akpm%2Fmmotm%2F&data=02%7C01%7CVijendar.Mukunda%40amd.com%7C34f06090b5394f9ccb9d08d82238c5cf%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637296974530250787&sdata=K8z5g9P5S7Ct%2BojnITdP0xuz159sYOiDWOyUy3abDpo%3D&reserved=0 >>> >>> This is a snapshot of my -mm patch queue. Uploaded at random hopefully >>> more than once a week. >>> >>> You will need quilt to apply these patches to the latest Linus release (5.x >>> or 5.x-rcY). The series file is in broken-out.tar.gz and is duplicated in >>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fozlabs.org%2F~akpm%2Fmmotm%2Fseries&data=02%7C01%7CVijendar.Mukunda%40amd.com%7C34f06090b5394f9ccb9d08d82238c5cf%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637296974530250787&sdata=6CpbYkoZTJ%2FxqhyFKdZMjH%2BdG5kjOgogt8KqqNK%2BzSI%3D&reserved=0 >>> >> >> on i386: >> >> when CONFIG_ACPI is not set/enabled: >> >> ../sound/soc/amd/renoir/rn-pci-acp3x.c: In function ‘snd_rn_acp_probe’: >> ../sound/soc/amd/renoir/rn-pci-acp3x.c:222:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_evaluate_integer’; did you mean ‘acpi_evaluate_object’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> ret = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_WOV", NULL, &dmic_status); > Will add ACPI as dependency in Kconfig for Renoir ACP driver. > Do i need to upload new version of the patch? or should i submit the incremental patch as a fix >> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> acpi_evaluate_object Hi, Not my call, but I would go with an incremental patch. thanks. -- ~Randy
