On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 9:23 AM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add audit container identifier auxiliary record to user event standalone > records. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > kernel/audit.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c > index 54dd2cb69402..997c34178ee8 100644 > --- a/kernel/audit.c > +++ b/kernel/audit.c > @@ -1507,6 +1504,14 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh) > audit_log_n_untrustedstring(ab, str, data_len); > } > audit_log_end(ab); > + rcu_read_lock(); > + cont = _audit_contobj_get(current); > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + audit_log_container_id(context, cont); > + rcu_read_lock(); > + _audit_contobj_put(cont); > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + audit_free_context(context); I haven't searched the entire patchset, but it seems like the pattern above happens a couple of times in this patchset, yes? If so would it make sense to wrap the above get/log/put in a helper function? Not a big deal either way, I'm pretty neutral on it at this point in the patchset but thought it might be worth mentioning in case you noticed the same and were on the fence. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
