Hello Sedat, For v1.0.3 and later releases, we can provide tar.xz tarballs, hashes and detached signatures. But is there a reason why hashes are required despite the signature? We will let you know when it's done. Thanks. Regards, Hyunchul 2020년 6월 30일 (화) 오후 7:16, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>님이 작성: > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:17 AM Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi folk, > > > > We have released exfatprogs-1.0.3 version. > > Any feedback is welcome!:) > > > > CHANGES : > > * Rename label.exfat to tune.exfat. > > * tune.exfat: change argument style(-l option for print level, > > -L option for setting label) > > * mkfs.exfat: harmonize set volume label option with tune.exfat. > > > > NEW FEATURES : > > * Add man page. > > > > BUG FIXES : > > * Fix the reported build warnings/errors. > > * Add memset to clean garbage in allocation. > > * Fix wrong volume label array size. > > * Open a device using O_EXCL to avoid formatting it while it is mounted. > > * Fix incomplete "make dist" generated tarball. > > > > The git tree is at: > > https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs > > > > The tarballs can be found at: > > https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs/releases/download/1.0.3/exfatprogs-1.0.3.tar.gz > > > > Hi, > > thanks for the upgrade. > > Today, I contacted the Debian maintainer on how he wants to > distinguish between exfat-utils vs. exfatprogs as Linux v5.7 entered > Debian/unstable. > > When I looked at the release/tags page on github: > > Can you please offer tar.xz tarballs, please? > Hashes? Like sha256sum > Signing keys? (Signed tarballs?) > > Thanks. > > Regards, > - Sedat -
