On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 21:23:03 -0700 Lepton Wu <ytht.net@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The document reads "%e" should be executable file name while actually > it could be changed by things like pr_ctl PR_SET_NAME. We can't really > change the behavior of "%e" for now, so introduce a new "%f" for the > real executable file name. Please explain (in as much detail as possible) why you believe the kernel should be changed in this way.
