On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 03:14:49PM +0200, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> Err, since you're both:
> - the official upstream author,
> - the official packager in fedora,
>
> why do you package so many uncommited patches in your fedora package?
> util-linux-ng-2.13-ctrlaltdel-man.patch
distribution specific patch
> util-linux-ng-2.13-fdformat-man-ide.patch
> util-linux-ng-2.13-floppy-generic.patch
> util-linux-ng-2.13-floppy-locale.patch
distribution specific patches -- upstream does not include
the"floppy" util
> util-linux-ng-2.13-fdisk-b-4096.patch
> util-linux-ng-2.13-ipcs-32bit.patch
> util-linux-ng-2.13-login-lastlog.patch
> util-linux-ng-2.13-login-pamstart.patch
not sure, maybe good enough for upstream (we will see in 2.15..)
> util-linux-ng-2.13-mount-pamconsole.patch
old distribution specific patch (not planned for F10)
> util-linux-ng-2.14-blockdev-rmpart.patch
(stupid) distribution specific patch (duplicate delpart(1)
functionality.
> util-linux-ng-2.14-mount-file_t.patch
already in upstream devel repository
> util-linux-ng-2.14-mount-managed.patch
distribution specific patch
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
