Re: [PATCH v7 5/8] loop: be paranoid on exit and prevent new additions / removals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22/06/2020 14:27, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
[...]> If you run run_0004.sh from break-blktrace [0]. Even with all my patches
> merged we still run into this. And so the bug lies within the block
> layer or on the driver. I haven't been able to find the issue yet.
> 
> [0] https://github.com/mcgrof/break-blktrace

Would it be a good idea to merge this into blktests? Maybe start a blktrace 
section for it, which could host other regression test for blktrace.

Thoughts?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux