On Thu, 04 Sep 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Are you going to revert the change forcing CL_SLAVE for > > !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)? I don't think we want that - I think that > > *within* a set of user mounts, propagation should be safe, right? > > > > Will you be able to do this soon? If not, should we just do the part > > returning -EPERM when turning a shared mount into a user mount? > > OK, let's do that first and the tricky part (propagation vs. user > mounts) later. Will push after I've tested it. Here it is: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git unprivileged-mounts I don't know what's next, this patchset has been in and out of -mm for as long as I can remember, but it hasn't generated much interest outside the two of us :) I do think this is an important feature though, even if not as sexy as some other things. Al? Is there any chance of this making it to 2.6.28? Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
