RE: [PATCH v3] exfat: remove EXFAT_SB_DIRTY flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Since this patch does not resolve 'VOL_DIRTY in ENOTEMPTY' problem you
> > mentioned, it would be better to remove the description above for that
> > and to make new patch.
> 
> I mentioned rmdir as an example.
> However, this problem is not only with rmdirs.
> VOL_DIRTY remains when some functions abort with an error.
> In original, VOL_DIRTY is not cleared even if performe 'sync'.
> With this patch, it ensures that VOL_DIRTY will be cleared by 'sync'.
> 
> Is my description insufficient?

I understood what you said. However, it is a natural result
when deleting the related code with EXFAT_SB_DIRTY flag.

So I thought it would be better to separate it into new problems
related to VOL_DIRTY-set under not real errors.

> 
> 
> BTW
> Even with this patch applied,  VOL_DIRTY remains until synced in the above
> case.
> It's not  easy to reproduce as rmdir, but I'll try to fix it in the future.

I think it's not a problem not to clear VOL_DIRTY under real errors,
because VOL_DIRTY is just like a hint to note that write was not finished clearly.

If you mean there are more situation like ENOTEMPTY you mentioned,
please make new patch to fix them.
Thanks.

> 
> 
> BR
> ---
> Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux