Re: [PATCH v3 17/25] mm: Add __page_cache_alloc_order

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 8:08 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 11:03:06AM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
> > > index 55199cb5bd66..1169e2428dd7 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
> > > @@ -205,15 +205,33 @@ static inline int page_cache_add_speculative(struct page *page, int count)
> > >         return __page_cache_add_speculative(page, count);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static inline gfp_t thp_gfpmask(gfp_t gfp)
> > > +{
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> > > +       /* We'd rather allocate smaller pages than stall a page fault */
> > > +       gfp |= GFP_TRANSHUGE_LIGHT;
> >
> > This looks not correct. GFP_TRANSHUGE_LIGHT may set GFP_FS, but some
> > filesystem may expect GFP_NOFS, i.e. in readahead path.
>
> Apologies, I overlooked this mail.
>
> In one of the prerequisite patches for this patch set (which is now merged
> as f2c817bed58d9be2051fad1d18e167e173c0c227), we call memalloc_nofs_save()
> in the readahead path.  That ensures all allocations will have GFP_NOFS
> set by the time the page allocator sees them.
>
> Thanks for checking on this.

Aha, yes, correct. I missed that. Thanks for finding that commit.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux