> Some fsck tool complain that padding part of the FileName field is not set
> to the value 0000h. So let's maintain filesystem cleaner, as exfat's spec.
> recommendation.
>
> Signe-off-by: Hyeongseok.Kim <Hyeongseok@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Looks good to me. Thanks.
> ---
> fs/exfat/dir.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exfat/dir.c b/fs/exfat/dir.c index de43534..8e775bd 100644
> --- a/fs/exfat/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/exfat/dir.c
> @@ -425,10 +425,12 @@ static void exfat_init_name_entry(struct
> exfat_dentry *ep,
> ep->dentry.name.flags = 0x0;
>
> for (i = 0; i < EXFAT_FILE_NAME_LEN; i++) {
> - ep->dentry.name.unicode_0_14[i] = cpu_to_le16(*uniname);
> - if (*uniname == 0x0)
> - break;
> - uniname++;
> + if (*uniname != 0x0) {
> + ep->dentry.name.unicode_0_14[i] =
> cpu_to_le16(*uniname);
> + uniname++;
> + } else {
> + ep->dentry.name.unicode_0_14[i] = 0x0;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
