From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 566d136289dc57816ac290de87a9a0f7d9bd3cbb ]
syzbot is reporting that splice()ing from non-empty read side to
already-full write side causes unkillable task, for opipe_prep() is by
error not inverting pipe_full() test.
CPU: 0 PID: 9460 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc3-next-20200228-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
RIP: 0010:rol32 include/linux/bitops.h:105 [inline]
RIP: 0010:iterate_chain_key kernel/locking/lockdep.c:369 [inline]
RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire+0x6a3/0x5270 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4178
Call Trace:
lock_acquire+0x197/0x420 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4720
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x156/0x13c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
pipe_lock_nested fs/pipe.c:66 [inline]
pipe_double_lock+0x1a0/0x1e0 fs/pipe.c:104
splice_pipe_to_pipe fs/splice.c:1562 [inline]
do_splice+0x35f/0x1520 fs/splice.c:1141
__do_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1447 [inline]
__se_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1427 [inline]
__x64_sys_splice+0x2b5/0x320 fs/splice.c:1427
do_syscall_64+0xf6/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:295
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
Reported-by: syzbot+b48daca8639150bc5e73@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9386d051e11e09973d5a4cf79af5e8cedf79386d
Fixes: 8cefc107ca54c8b0 ("pipe: Use head and tail pointers for the ring, not cursor and length")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 5.5+
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/splice.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/splice.c b/fs/splice.c
index d671936d0aad..39b11a9a6b98 100644
--- a/fs/splice.c
+++ b/fs/splice.c
@@ -1503,7 +1503,7 @@ static int opipe_prep(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, unsigned int flags)
* Check pipe occupancy without the inode lock first. This function
* is speculative anyways, so missing one is ok.
*/
- if (pipe_full(pipe->head, pipe->tail, pipe->max_usage))
+ if (!pipe_full(pipe->head, pipe->tail, pipe->max_usage))
return 0;
ret = 0;
--
2.25.1
