Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Relocate execve() sanity checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 05:40:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri,  5 Jun 2020 09:00:10 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > While looking at the code paths for the proposed O_MAYEXEC flag, I saw
> > some things that looked like they should be fixed up.
> > 
> >   exec: Change uselib(2) IS_SREG() failure to EACCES
> > 	This just regularizes the return code on uselib(2).
> > 
> >   exec: Move S_ISREG() check earlier
> > 	This moves the S_ISREG() check even earlier than it was already.
> > 
> >   exec: Move path_noexec() check earlier
> > 	This adds the path_noexec() check to the same place as the
> > 	S_ISREG() check.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> These don't seem super-urgent and they aren't super-reviewed, so I
> suggest we hold them off until the next cycle?

Agreed; that's fine by me. It's mostly clean up and preparation for
performing future checking through the MAY_EXEC path.

And I'd love to get an Ack from Al or Aleksa, nudge nudge. :)

-- 
Kees Cook



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux