>> The details can vary also for my suggestions. >> Would you point any more disagreements out on concrete items? > > That's exactly the problem with many of your comments. > They're vague to the point of unintelligibility. Was is so vague about possibilities which I point out for patch reviews (for example)? * Spelling corrections * Additional wording alternatives >>> But refcount -> reference count is not particularly interesting. >> >> Can a wording clarification become helpful also for this issue? > > This is a great example. I have no idea what this sentence means. Some developers usually prefer to use abbreviations at specific places while I dare to propose the usage of another well-known term for commit messages. Regards, Markus
