On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 05:14:20PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > Greeting, (Whoops, I missed this in my inbox.) > <<<test_start>>> > tag=execveat02 stime=1590373229 > cmdline="execveat02" > contacts="" > analysis=exit > <<<test_output>>> > tst_test.c:1246: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s > execveat02.c:64: PASS: execveat() fails as expected: EBADF (9) > execveat02.c:64: PASS: execveat() fails as expected: EINVAL (22) > execveat02.c:61: FAIL: execveat() fails unexpectedly, expected: ELOOP: EACCES (13) > execveat02.c:64: PASS: execveat() fails as expected: ENOTDIR (20) I will go check on this. Looking at the expected result (ELOOP) I think this just means the test needs adjustment because it's trying to double-check for a pathological case, but it seems their test setup trips the (now earlier) IS_SREG() test. But I'll double-check and report back! -- Kees Cook
