On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 04:51:48PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote:
> On 2020/4/14 0:30, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > This might be a good time to introduce a few new helpers:
> >
> > _require_scratch_dax ("Does $SCRATCH_DEV support DAX?")
> > _require_scratch_dax_mountopt ("Does the fs support the DAX mount options?")
> > _require_scratch_daX_iflag ("Does the fs support FS_XFLAG_DAX?")
> Hi Darrick,
>
> Now, I am trying to introduce these new helpers and have some questions:
> 1) There are five testcases related to old dax implementation, should we
> only convert them to new dax implementation or make them compatible with old
> and new dax implementation?
What is the 'old' DAX implementation? ext2 XIP?
> 2) I think _require_xfs_io_command "chattr" "x" is enough to check if fs
> supports FS_XFLAG_DAX. Is it necessary to add _require_scratch_dax_iflag()?
> like this:
> _require_scratch_dax_iflag()
> {
> _require_xfs_io_command "chattr" "x"
> }
I suggested that list based on the major control knobs that will be
visible to userspace programs. Even if this is just a one-line helper,
its name is useful for recognizing which of those knobs we're looking
for.
Yes, you could probably save a trivial amount of time by skipping one
iteration of bash function calling, but now everyone has to remember
that the xfs_io chattr "x" flag means the dax inode flag, and not
confuse it for chmod +x or something else.
--D
> Best Regards,
> Xiao Yang
>
>
