On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:44:41PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 08:33:40PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:22:08PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > > Hard limits at 80 really don't work well, especially with
> > > some of the 25+ character length identifiers used today.
> >
> > IMO any such identifier is a good reason for a warning.
> >
> > The litmus test is actually very simple: how unpleasant would it be
> > to mention the identifiers while discussing the code over the phone?
>
> Here's a good example of a function which should be taken out and shot:
>
> int amdgpu_atombios_get_leakage_vddc_based_on_leakage_params(struct amdgpu_devic
> e *adev,
> ...
> switch (frev) {
> case 2:
> switch (crev) {
> ...
> if (profile->ucElbVDDC_Num > 0) {
> for (i = 0; i < profile->ucElbVDDC_Num; i++) {
> if (vddc_id_buf[i] == virtual_voltage_id) {
> for (j = 0; j < profile->ucLeakageBinNum; j++) {
> if (vbios_voltage_id <= leakage_bin[j]) {
> *vddc = vddc_buf[j * profile->ucElbVDDC_Num + i];
>
> I mean, I get it that AMD want to show off just how studly a monitor they
> support, but good grief ...
I must respectfully disagree. It clearly needs to be hanged, drawn and
quartered...
