Re: [vfs:uaccess.net 16/19] net/atm/ioctl.c:180:29: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 03:23:21PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 09:58:00PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git uaccess.net
> > head:   0edecc020b33f8e31d8baa80735b45e8e8434700
> > commit: a3929484af75ee524419edbbc4e9ce012c3d67c9 [16/19] atm: move copyin from atm_getnames() into the caller
> > config: arm64-randconfig-s002-20200521 (attached as .config)
> > compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
> > reproduce:
> >         # apt-get install sparse
> >         # sparse version: v0.6.1-193-gb8fad4bc-dirty
> >         git checkout a3929484af75ee524419edbbc4e9ce012c3d67c9
> >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> >         make W=1 C=1 ARCH=arm64 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__'
> > 
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > 
> > sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> > 
> > >> net/atm/ioctl.c:180:29: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
> 
> Huh?
> 
> >  > 180				if (get_user(buf, &iobuf->buffer))
> 
> _what_ use of plain integer as a NULL pointer?  <looks>
> Misannotated get_user() on arm64 - should be
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index 32fc8061aa76..bc5c7b091152 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ do {									\
>  		__p = uaccess_mask_ptr(__p);				\
>  		__raw_get_user((x), __p, (err));			\
>  	} else {							\
> -		(x) = 0; (err) = -EFAULT;				\
> +		(x) = (__force __typeof__(x))0; (err) = -EFAULT;	\
>  	}								\
>  } while (0)
>  
> and that's a _lot_ of noise in sparse logs on arm64, obviously - one for
> each get_user() of a pointer...

Thanks for pointing this out. We seem to do the right thing for
__raw_get_user() but missed one path in __get_user_error().

Since you wrote the patch already, are you ok for me to add some text
and your signed-off-by?

-- 
Catalin



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux