Re: No, really, stop trying to delete slab until you've finished making slub perform as well

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pekka Enberg wrote:

This patch hard locks on my 2-way 64-bit x86 machine (sysrq doesn't respond) when I run hackbench.
At that point we take the listlock and then the slab lock which is a lock inversion if we do not use a trylock here. Crap.

Hmmm.. The code already goes to the next slab if an earlier one is already locked. So I do not see how the large partial lists could be generated.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux