On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 06:40 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > Although I don't have strong opinion, however, I've noticed > WRITE_BARRIER seems to be already doing similar thing. So, I just > imaged it like following... OK, that makes sense. I'll change it to be consistent with that then. Thank you. > [I don't know whether blkdev_issue_flush() > really want to use (1 << BIO_RW_BARRIER) or not.] I think it seems reasonable, but let's do it in a separate patch. Do you want me to put it in my tree, or will you send it to Jens directly? -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
