Re: [PATCH] fixup! signal: factor copy_siginfo_to_external32 from copy_siginfo_to_user32

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 8:45 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 09:56:26PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I think I found a way to improve the x32 handling:
> >
> > This is a simplification over Christoph's "[PATCH 2/7] signal: factor
> > copy_siginfo_to_external32 from copy_siginfo_to_user32", reducing the
> > x32 specifics in the common code to a single #ifdef/#endif check, in
> > order to keep it more readable for everyone else.
> >
> > Christoph, if you like it, please fold into your patch.
>
> What do you think of this version?  This one always overrides
> copy_siginfo_to_user32 for the x86 compat case to keep the churn down,
> and improves the copy_siginfo_to_external32 documentation a bit.

Looks good to me. I preferred checking for X32 explicitly (so we can
find and kill off the #ifdef if we ever remove X32 for good), but there is
little difference in the end.

         Arnd



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux