On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:05:53AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 09:36:30AM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> > Hi Christoph,
> >
> > > FYI, these little hunks reduce the difference to my version, maybe
> > > you can fold them in?
> >
> > Sure, no problem.
> >
> > How do you want to coordinate these? I can submit mine through mpe, but
> > that may make it tricky to synchronise with your changes. Or, you can
> > include this change in your series if you prefer.
>
> Maybe you can feed your patch directly to Linus through Michael
> ASAP, and I'll wait for that before resubmitting this series?
Btw, turns out my fold patch didn't actually compile without the
rebased patch on top, sorry. Here is the proper one:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/file.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/file.c
index c62d77ddaf7d3..b4e1ef650b406 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/file.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/file.c
@@ -2107,7 +2107,6 @@ static const struct file_operations spufs_wbox_info_fops = {
static void ___spufs_dma_info_read(struct spu_context *ctx,
struct spu_dma_info *info)
{
- struct mfc_cq_sr *qp, *spuqp;
int i;
info->dma_info_type = ctx->csa.priv2.spu_tag_status_query_RW;
@@ -2116,8 +2115,8 @@ static void ___spufs_dma_info_read(struct spu_context *ctx,
info->dma_info_stall_and_notify = ctx->csa.spu_chnldata_RW[25];
info->dma_info_atomic_command_status = ctx->csa.spu_chnldata_RW[27];
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
- qp = &info->dma_info_command_data[i];
- spuqp = &ctx->csa.priv2.spuq[i];
+ struct mfc_cq_sr *qp = &info->dma_info_command_data[i];
+ struct mfc_cq_sr *spuqp = &ctx->csa.priv2.spuq[i];
qp->mfc_cq_data0_RW = spuqp->mfc_cq_data0_RW;
qp->mfc_cq_data1_RW = spuqp->mfc_cq_data1_RW;
@@ -2166,7 +2165,7 @@ static const struct file_operations spufs_dma_info_fops = {
};
static void ___spufs_proxydma_info_read(struct spu_context *ctx,
- struct spu_proxydma_info *info)
+ struct spu_proxydma_info *info)
{
int i;
