Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] posix-cpu-timers: Always call __get_task_for_clock holding rcu_read_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
>
>> This allows the getref flag to be removed and the callers can
>> than take a task reference if needed.
>
> That changelog lacks any form of information why this should be
> changed. I can see the point vs. patch 2, but pretty please put coherent
> explanations into each patch.

Well excess flags bad.  But in this case I can do even better.

The code no longer takes a reference on task_struct so this patch
removes unnecessary code.

I will see if I can say that better.



>> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
>> index 2fd3b3fa68bf..eba41c70f0f0 100644
>> --- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
>> +++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
>> @@ -86,36 +86,34 @@ static struct task_struct *lookup_task(const pid_t pid, bool thread,
>>  }
>>  
>>  static struct task_struct *__get_task_for_clock(const clockid_t clock,
>> -						bool getref, bool gettime)
>> +						bool gettime)
>>  {
>>  	const bool thread = !!CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(clock);
>>  	const pid_t pid = CPUCLOCK_PID(clock);
>> -	struct task_struct *p;
>>  
>>  	if (CPUCLOCK_WHICH(clock) >= CPUCLOCK_MAX)
>>  		return NULL;
>>  
>> -	rcu_read_lock();
>> -	p = lookup_task(pid, thread, gettime);
>> -	if (p && getref)
>> -		get_task_struct(p);
>> -	rcu_read_unlock();
>> -	return p;
>> +	return lookup_task(pid, thread, gettime);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static inline struct task_struct *get_task_for_clock(const clockid_t clock)
>>  {
>> -	return __get_task_for_clock(clock, true, false);
>> +	return __get_task_for_clock(clock, false);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static inline struct task_struct *get_task_for_clock_get(const clockid_t clock)
>>  {
>> -	return __get_task_for_clock(clock, true, true);
>> +	return __get_task_for_clock(clock, true);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static inline int validate_clock_permissions(const clockid_t clock)
>>  {
>> -	return __get_task_for_clock(clock, false, false) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
>> +	int ret;
>
> New line between declarations and code please.
>
>> +	rcu_read_lock();
>> +	ret = __get_task_for_clock(clock, false) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
>> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>> +	return ret;
>>  }
>
> Thanks,
>
>         tglx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux