Re: [PATCH v8 01/11] scsi: free sgtables in case command setup fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/27/20 1:31 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
In case scsi_setup_fs_cmnd() fails we're not freeing the sgtables
allocated by scsi_init_io(), thus we leak the allocated memory.

So free the sgtables allocated by scsi_init_io() in case
scsi_setup_fs_cmnd() fails.

Technically scsi_setup_scsi_cmnd() does not suffer from this problem, as
it can only fail if scsi_init_io() fails, so it does not have sgtables
allocated. But to maintain symmetry and as a measure of defensive
programming, free the sgtables on scsi_setup_scsi_cmnd() failure as well.
scsi_mq_free_sgtables() has safeguards against double-freeing of memory so
this is safe to do.

While we're at it, rename scsi_mq_free_sgtables() to scsi_free_sgtables().

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205595
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke            Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx                               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux