Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] btrfs: use set/clear_fs_page_private

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/27/20 12:20 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:49:19PM +0200, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
Since the new pair function is introduced, we can call them to clean the
code in btrfs.

Cc: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
....

  void set_page_extent_mapped(struct page *page)
  {
-	if (!PagePrivate(page)) {
-		SetPagePrivate(page);
-		get_page(page);
-		set_page_private(page, EXTENT_PAGE_PRIVATE);
-	}
+	if (!PagePrivate(page))
+		set_fs_page_private(page, (void *)EXTENT_PAGE_PRIVATE);
Change the definition of EXTENT_PAGE_PRIVATE so the cast is not
needed? Nothing ever reads EXTENT_PAGE_PRIVATE; it's only there to
set the private flag for other code to check and release the extent
mapping reference to the page...

Not know the code well, so I just make the cast ...

@@ -8331,11 +8328,9 @@ static int btrfs_migratepage(struct address_space *mapping,
if (page_has_private(page)) {
  		ClearPagePrivate(page);
-		get_page(newpage);
-		set_page_private(newpage, page_private(page));
+		set_fs_page_private(newpage, (void *)page_private(page));
  		set_page_private(page, 0);
  		put_page(page);
-		SetPagePrivate(newpage);
  	}
This is just:
		set_fs_page_private(newpage, clear_fs_page_private(page));


Thanks a lot! It is more better.

Thanks,
Guoqing



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux