Why not attach_page_private and clear_page_private as that conveys
the use case a little better?
> +static inline void *set_fs_page_private(struct page *page, void *data)
> +{
> + get_page(page);
> + set_page_private(page, (unsigned long)data);
> + SetPagePrivate(page);
> +
> + return data;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void *clear_fs_page_private(struct page *page)
> +{
> + void *data = (void *)page_private(page);
> +
> + if (!PagePrivate(page))
> + return NULL;
> + ClearPagePrivate(page);
> + set_page_private(page, 0);
> + put_page(page);
> +
> + return data;
> +}
Can you add kerneldoc comments describing them, including why we
take the refernces? Also what is the point of the return value
of set_fs_page_private?
