On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 12:21:43PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add a test for new syncfs error reporting behavior. When an inode fails
> to be written back, ensure that a subsequent call to syncfs() will also
> report an error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
> tests/generic/999 | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/generic/999.out | 8 +++++
> tests/generic/group | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/generic/999
> create mode 100644 tests/generic/999.out
>
> v2:
> - update license comment
> - only write a page of data
> - don't bother testing for enough scratch space
> - don't hold file open over test
>
> Thanks to Brian Foster for the review! This is testing a proposed
> behavior change and is dependent on this patchset being merged:
>
> vfs: have syncfs() return error when there are writeback errors
>
> We'll probably want to wait until its fate is clear before merging this.
>
> diff --git a/tests/generic/999 b/tests/generic/999
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..cdc0772d0774
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/999
> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +# Copyright (c) 2020, Jeff Layton. All rights reserved.
> +# FS QA Test No. 999
> +#
> +# Open a file and write to it and fsync. Then, flip the data device to throw
> +# errors, write to it again and do an fdatasync. Then open an O_RDONLY fd on
> +# the same file and call syncfs against it and ensure that an error is reported.
> +# Then call syncfs again and ensure that no error is reported. Finally, repeat
> +# the open and syncfs and ensure that there is no error reported.
> +
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1 # failure is the default!
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> + cd /
> + rm -f $tmp.*
> + _dmerror_cleanup
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +. ./common/dmerror
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_os Linux
> +_require_scratch_nocheck
> +# This test uses "dm" without taking into account the data could be on
> +# realtime subvolume, thus the test will fail with rtinherit=1
> +_require_no_rtinherit
> +_require_dm_target error
> +
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +echo "Format and mount"
> +_scratch_mkfs > $seqres.full 2>&1
> +_dmerror_init
> +_dmerror_mount
> +
> +
> +# create file
> +testfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/syncfs-reports-errors
> +touch $testfile
> +
> +# write a page of data to file, and call fsync
> +datalen=$(getconf PAGE_SIZE)
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -W -q 0 $datalen" $testfile
> +
> +# flip device to non-working mode
> +_dmerror_load_error_table
> +
> +# rewrite the data and call fdatasync
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -w -q 0 $datalen" $testfile
> +
> +# heal the device error
> +_dmerror_load_working_table
> +
> +# open again and call syncfs twice
> +echo "One of the following syncfs calls should fail with EIO:"
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -r -c syncfs -c syncfs $testfile
> +echo "done"
> +
> +echo "This syncfs call should succeed:"
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -r -c syncfs $testfile
> +echo "done"
> +
> +# success, all done
> +_dmerror_cleanup
> +
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/generic/999.out b/tests/generic/999.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..950a2ba42503
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/999.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +QA output created by 999
> +Format and mount
> +fdatasync: Input/output error
> +One of the following syncfs calls should fail with EIO:
> +syncfs: Input/output error
> +done
> +This syncfs call should succeed:
> +done
> diff --git a/tests/generic/group b/tests/generic/group
> index 718575baeef9..9bcf296fc3dd 100644
> --- a/tests/generic/group
> +++ b/tests/generic/group
> @@ -598,3 +598,4 @@
> 594 auto quick quota
> 595 auto quick encrypt
> 596 auto quick
> +999 auto quick
> --
> 2.25.3
>
