Re: [PATCH 6/9] nfsd: fix empty-body warning in nfs4state.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/18/20 11:53 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-04-18 at 14:45 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>> On Apr 18, 2020, at 2:41 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Fix gcc empty-body warning when -Wextra is used:
>>>
>>> ../fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:3898:3: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ‘else’ statement [-Wempty-body]
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> I have a patch in my queue that addresses this particular warning,
>> but your change works for me too.
>>
>> Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Unless Bruce objects.
>>
>>
>>> ---
>>> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c |    3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> --- linux-next-20200417.orig/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>>> +++ linux-next-20200417/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>>>
>>> #include <linux/file.h>
>>> #include <linux/fs.h>
>>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>>> #include <linux/namei.h>
>>> #include <linux/swap.h>
>>> @@ -3895,7 +3896,7 @@ nfsd4_setclientid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp
>>> 		copy_clid(new, conf);
>>> 		gen_confirm(new, nn);
>>> 	} else /* case 4 (new client) or cases 2, 3 (client reboot): */
>>> -		;
>>> +		do_empty();
>>> 	new->cl_minorversion = 0;
>>> 	gen_callback(new, setclid, rqstp);
>>> 	add_to_unconfirmed(new);
> 
> This empty else seems silly and could likely be better handled by
> a comment above the first if, something like:
> 
> 	/* for now only handle case 1: probable callback update */
> 	if (conf && same_verf(&conf->cl_verifier, &clverifier)) {
> 		copy_clid(new, conf);
> 		gen_confirm(new, nn);
> 	}
> 
> with no else use.

I'll just let Chuck handle it with his current patch,
whatever it is.

thanks.
-- 
~Randy




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux