On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 8:13 PM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:20:11AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> > I'd rather keep it out of this series and to
> >> > an interested party. Then again x32 doesn't seem to have a whole lot
> >> > of interested parties..
> >>
> >> Fine with me. It's on my mental list of things that we want to kill off
> >> eventually as soon as the remaining users stop replying to questions
> >> about it.
> >>
> >> In fact I should really turn that into a properly maintained list in
> >> Documentation/... that contains any options that someone has
> >> asked about removing in the past, along with the reasons for keeping
> >> it around and a time at which we should ask about it again.
> >
> > To the newly added x86 maintainers: Arnd brought up the point that
> > elf_core_dump writes the ABI siginfo format into the core dump. That
> > format differs for i386 vs x32. Is there any good way to find out
> > which is the right format when are not in a syscall?
> >
> > As far a I can tell x32 vs i386 just seems to be based around what
> > syscall table was used for the current syscall, but core dumps aren't
> > always in syscall context.
>
> I don't think this matters. The i386 and x32 signal structures
> only differ for SIGCHLD. The SIGCHLD signal does cause coredumps.
> So as long as we get the 32bit vs 64bit distinct correct all should be
> well.
Ok, makes sense. Thanks for taking a look into this!
Arnd
