Re: improve use_mm / unuse_mm v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/15/20 11:31 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> this series improves the use_mm / unuse_mm interface by better
> documenting the assumptions, and my taking the set_fs manipulations
> spread over the callers into the core API.
> 
> Changes since v1:
>  - drop a few patches
>  - fix a comment typo
>  - cover the newly merged use_mm/unuse_mm caller in vfio

You can add my reviewed-by/tested-by to the patches, passes the
io_uring regression tests.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux