RE: [PATCH v2] exfat: replace 'time_ms' with 'time_10ms'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > When using '100' for the divisor, I think cs (centi-sec) is easier to
> > understand than 10ms.
> > Which do you prefer, time_10ms or time_cs?
> Can you resend the patch again after changing to time_cs ?

Of course.
And, rebase to your for-next.


BR
---
Kohada Tetsuhiro <Kohada.Tetsuhiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux